Dilema Kemitraan Iklim Global: Analisis Naratif Kerjasama Indonesia dan Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) dalam Arsitektur Rezim Transisi Energi
Keywords:
International Cooperation, Energy Transition, Indonesia JETP, Neoliberal Institutionalism, Climate Regime, North-South Relations.Abstract
The post-Paris Agreement transformation of global energy governance necessitates a fundamental reorientation in the relational dynamics between advanced industrialized economies and developing nations. Among the most salient manifestations of contemporary climate diplomacy is the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP), negotiated between the Government of Indonesia and the International Partners Group (IPG). This article critically examines the institutional dynamics, effectiveness, and structural frictions inherent in Indonesia's JETP through the theoretical lens of Neoliberal Institutionalism. Employing a descriptive-qualitative approach rooted in extensive library research and policy document analysis, this inquiry explores how JETP operates as a minilateral climate regime. The analytical findings reveal that while JETP has successfully institutionalized policy coordination, mitigated technical information asymmetries, and lowered transactional costs, its substantive efficacy remains hampered by systemic inequalities. The disproportionate reliance on commercial debt instruments over non-repayable grants has exacerbated domestic apprehensions over fiscal sovereignty costs. Simultaneously, contentious negotiations regarding off-grid captive coal-fired power plants powering nickel smelters illuminate the intractable friction between national developmental imperatives and global decarbonization norms. Ultimately, this partnership illustrates that international institutions can effectively orchestrate technical governance, yet struggle to resolve the deep-seated dilemma of distributive climate justice between the Global North and Global South.
Downloads
References
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eckersley, R. (2012). Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00107
Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (1997). Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge University Press.
Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR). (2023). Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook 2024: Tracking Progress of Energy Transition in Indonesia. Jakarta: IESR.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). An Energy Sector Roadmap to Net Zero Emissions in Indonesia. Paris: IEA Publications. https://www.iea.org/reports/an-energy-sector-roadmap-to- net-zero-emissions-in-indonesia
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and Interdependence (4th ed.). Longman.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and Discord in Global Climate Policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1983). International Regimes. Cornell University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.
Pikulicka, A. (2023). Indonesia’s $20bn Clean Energy Transition is Caught in a Web of Interests. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/0b8e7b9e-691b-4f9e-874b-c741e97669ef
Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy. MIT Press.
Sekretariat JETP. (2023). Comprehensive Investment and Policy Plan (CIPP) 2023: Pathway towards Indonesia’s Just Energy Transition. Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia.
Setiawan, B. (2023). The Political Economy of Energy Transition in Indonesia: Coal Phase-Out and Renewable Energy Dilemma. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 13(2), 145–168.
Victor, D. G. (2011). Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. Cambridge University Press.
Warburton, E. (2018). Resource Nationalism in Post-Boom Indonesia: The Pivot back to State Control. The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 107(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2018.1476094
World Bank. (2023). Scaling Up Finance for the Clean Energy Transition in Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fikri Ardiyansyah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
