Pemikiran Equaliti Berkualitas Dalam Era Kontemporer
Keywords:
Philosophical Thought, Contemporary Era, Digital Technology, Contemporary High-Quality EqualityAbstract
This paper is an inquiry into the conceptual understanding and philosophical reflections on the aspiration for high-quality equality, which constitutes a fundamental right for all global citizens, without exception to the people of Indonesia. In philosophy, the concept of equality centers on fundamental questions regarding how human beings ought to be treated and how resources and opportunities should be equitably distributed. The caliber of philosophical thought on this issue relies heavily on the clarity of the core variables used to define it. Furthermore, it addresses how high-quality equality can be realized in the contemporary era amidst the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The quality of philosophical thought regarding equality is not judged by the enforced uniformity of final outcomes, as forcibly leveling results often infringes upon individual liberty. Instead, ideal philosophical equality is appraised by a system’s capacity to eliminate structural discrimination, compensate for natural disadvantages (brute luck), equalize basic human capabilities to flourish, and cultivate mutually respectful social relations free from oppressive power hierarchies. Ultimately, high-quality equality in the contemporary era must be inclusive, technologically adaptive, and sensitive to diverse backgrounds. True equality today is achieved not by making everyone identical, but by ensuring that differences never serve as a pretext for marginalization or discrimination
Downloads
References
Aburaera, S., Muhadar, & Maskun. (2021). Filsafat Hukum Teori dan Praktik. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Anderson, E. S. (1999). What is the Point of Equality?. Ethics, 109(2), 287-337.
Arneson, R. J. (1989). Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56(1), 77-93.
Budhijanto, D. (2026). Filsafat dan Teori Hukum Era AI (Artificial Intelligence). Bandung: Logoz Publishing.
Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906-944.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
De Cruz, P. (2010). Comparative Law in a Changing World: Perbandingan Sistem Hukum: Common Law, Civil Law and Socialist Law. Bandung: Nusamedia.
Dworkin, R. (1981). What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283-345.
Fernando, Z. J., & Imanuddin, M. (2025). Hukum dan Artificial Intelligence: Masa Depan Keadilan di Era Digital. Depok: Rajawali Pers / PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Hakeem, M. A. G. (2025). Transformasi Paradigma Filsafat Hukum di Era Kecerdasan Buatan: Analisis Filosofis atas Legitimasi, Akuntabilitas, dan Keadilan. Mimbar Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 112- 130.
Hasan, E. (2011). Filsafat Ilmu dan Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Huijbers, T. (1998). Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Kant, I. (1785/1998). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Latif, M. (2020). Orientasi Ke Arah Pemahaman Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Lesmana, C. T., Pebrianto, D. Y., & Erfina, A. (2025). Keadilan Mesin: Telaah Filosofis atas Legitimasi Keputusan Hukum Berbasis Algoritma dalam Kerangka Filsafat Keadilan. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 7(1), 115-128.
Marwala, T., & Mpedi, L. G. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Global Perspectives, Regulatory Challenges, and Emerging Jurisprudence. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Menski, W. (2006). Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa (Edisi ke-2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merryman, J. H., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2019). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (Edisi ke-4). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ragone, S., & Smorto, G. (2024). Comparative Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rasji, & Akhirudin. (2024). Eksistensi Kecerdasan Buatan sebagai Subjek Hukum: Kajian Holistik Berdasarkan Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Eksistensialis. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(3), 979-994.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rusdi, Ardiansyah, M. R., & Hoesein, Z. A. (2026). Filsafat Hukum di Era Kecerdasan Buatan. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal (IPSSJ), 4(1), 35-48.
Sen, A. (1979). Equality of What?. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford University, 195-220.
Smuha, N. A. (Ed.), & Müller, V. C. (2025). The Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Ethics and Policy of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tim Akademisi / Peneliti Hukum. (2025). Filsafat Hukum di Era Transformasi Sosial, Digital, dan AI. Jakarta: Konsorsium Publikasi Ilmiah.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Virk, S. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Global Perspectives, Regulatory Challenges, and Emerging Jurisprudence. London: Routledge.
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (Edisi ke-3, Terj. T. Weir). Oxford: Clarendon Press / Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didi Sukardi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
