Dilema Keamanan dalam Perlombaan Senjata Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Militer antara Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok: Implikasi terhadap Stabilitas Keamanan Internasional

Authors

  • Muhammad Misbahhudin Universitas Satyagama Author

Keywords:

International Security, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Security Dilemma, United States, China, Autonomous Weapons, Algorithmic Warfare.

Abstract

The hegemonic rivalry between the United States and China has extended into the domain of Artificial Intelligence (AI), catalyzing a new autonomous arms race. This article examines how military AI activates the security dilemma and undermines global stability. Grounded in Kenneth Waltz’s Neorealism and Robert Jervis’s offense-defense differentiation, this qualitative study utilizes process tracing and critical documentary analysis. It reveals that the intangible and dual-use nature of AI erodes the boundary between defensive and offensive postures. Consequently, integrating AI into warfighting doctrines—such as the U.S. JADC2 and China's Intelligentized Warfare—fuels a spiral of uncertainty, severely compresses human command deliberation, and heightens the risk of algorithmic flash wars. At the macro level, battlefield transparency compromises nuclear deterrence stability, while multilateral diplomacy in Geneva remains deadlocked. This study concludes that the pursuit of algorithmic military superiority engenders profound strategic fragility, underscoring the urgent need for institutionalized confidence-building measures and a binding taboo against AI in nuclear command.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, G. C. (2019). Understanding China's AI Strategy: Clues to Chinese Strategic Thinking on Artificial Intelligence and National Security. Center for a New American Security (CNAS). https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/understanding-chinas-ai-strategy

Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Asaro, P. (2019). What is an "Autonomous Weapon"? International Review of the Red Cross, 101(912), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383120000438

Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General Purpose Technologies ‘Engines of Growth’? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T

Christensen, T. J. (2020). There Will Not Be a New Cold War: The Limits of U.S.-Chinese Competition. Foreign Affairs, 100(1), 40–53.

Cordesman, A. H. (2020). China's New 2019 Defense White Paper: An Analysis of the Strategic and Military Implications. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Geist, E., & Lohn, A. J. (2018). How Might Artificial Intelligence Affect the Risk of Nuclear War? RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/PE296

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.

Glaser, C. L. (1997). The Security Dilemma Revisited. World Politics, 50(1), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388710001476X

Heginbotham, E., Nixon, M., Morgan, F. E., Heim, J. L., Hagen, J., Li, S., ... & Morris, L. J. (2015). The U.S.-China Military Scorecard: Forces, Geography, and the Evolving Balance of Power, 1996–2017. RAND Corporation.

Herz, J. H. (1951). Political Realism and Political Idealism: A Study in Theories and Realities. University of Chicago Press.

Horowitz, M. C. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power. Texas National Security Review, 1(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.15781/T2639KP49

Howard, M. (2009). War in European History (Updated ed.). Oxford University Press.International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). (2023). The Military Balance 2023. Routledge.

Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958

Johnson, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Warfare: The USA, China, and Strategic Stability. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526145055

Johnson, J. (2021). The AI-Cyber Nexus: Implications for Military Escalation, Deterrence and Strategic Stability. Cyber Defense Review, 6(1), 93–112.

Kania, E. B. (2018). China's Military Biotech Frontier: CRISPR, Military-Civil Fusion, and the Future of Warfare. The Jamestown Foundation.

Kania, E. B. (2021). “Intelligentized” Warfare: The PLA’s Approach to AI and Autonomous Systems. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2017). The New Era of Counterforce: Technological Change and the End of MAD. International Security, 41(4), 9–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00273

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2021). The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics. Foreign Affairs, 100(6), 48–58.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI). (2021). Final Report: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence. NSCAI.

Payne, K. (2021). I, Warbot: The Dawn of Artificially Intelligent Conflict. Oxford University Press.

Scharre, P. (2018). Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. W. W. Norton & Company.

Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. Penguin Press.

State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. (2019). China's National Defense in the New Era. Foreign Languages Press.

Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2023). SIPRI Yearbook 2023: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford University Press.

United States Department of Defense. (2022). 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Office of the Secretary of Defense.

United States Department of Defense. (2023). Data, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence Adoption Strategy. Office of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Wareham, M. (2020). The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots and the Challenge of Regulating Autonomous Weapons. Ethics & International Affairs, 34(4), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679420000570

Work, R. O., & Brimley, S. (2014). 20YY: Preparing for War in the Robotic Age. Center for a New American Security (CNAS).

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Muhammad Misbahhudin. (2025). Dilema Keamanan dalam Perlombaan Senjata Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Militer antara Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok: Implikasi terhadap Stabilitas Keamanan Internasional. Journal Social Politics and Humanities, 1(2), 1-12. https://www.journalsph.com/index.php/home/article/view/17

Similar Articles

1-10 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.