KERJA SAMA INDONESIA–NORWEGIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI RESULT-BASED CONTRIBUTION UNTUK PENGURANGAN EMISI DARI DEFORESTASI DAN DEGRADASI HUTAN PERIODE 2020–2025

Authors

  • Fikri Ardiyansyah Universitas Satyagama Author

Keywords:

International Cooperation, Indonesia–Norway, Result-Based Contribution, Deforestation, Climate Change.

Abstract

Climate change represents a global challenge requiring international cooperation, particularly in reducing greenhouse gas emissions resulting from deforestation and forest degradation. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Indonesia–Norway cooperation through the Result-Based Contribution (RBC) mechanism in supporting forest-sector emission reductions during 2020–2025. This research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing literature reviews and official document analysis. Robert O. Keohane's liberal institutionalism theory provides the analytical framework for examining shared interests, institutional roles, and bilateral cooperation mechanisms. The findings indicate that Indonesia–Norway cooperation underwent institutional restructuring through a renewed agreement in 2022 following the termination of the previous partnership in 2021. The RBC mechanism was implemented through financial contributions based on verified emission reductions, with Norway's total contributions reaching USD216 million by 2025. Nevertheless, increased deforestation in 2024 demonstrates persistent challenges in ensuring sustainable forest protection. The study concludes that the RBC mechanism strengthens environmental diplomacy and climate financing. However, its long-term effectiveness depends on transparency, accountability, and consistent implementation of Indonesia's forest governance policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelsen, A. (Ed.). (2008). Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and implications. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D., & Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (Eds.). (2009). Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W. D., & Verchot, L. V. (Eds.). (2012). Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Arts, B., & Babili, I. (2013). Global forest governance: Multiple practices of policy performance. Wageningen Academic Publishers.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2023). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Rajamani, L. (2017). International climate change law. Oxford University Press.

Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2015). Governing climate change (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dauvergne, P. (2001). Loggers and degradation in the Asia-Pacific: Corporations and environmental management. Cambridge University Press.

Dauvergne, P. (2008). The shadows of consumption: Consequences for the global environment. MIT Press.

Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., & Schlosberg, D. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press.

Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. Routledge.

Harris, P. G. (Ed.). (2014). Routledge handbook of global environmental politics. Routledge.

Held, D., & Roger, C. (2018). Global governance at risk. Polity Press.

Hurrell, A., & Kingsbury, B. (Eds.). (1992). The international politics of the environment: Actors, interests, and institutions. Clarendon Press.

Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.

Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Westview Press.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Longman.

Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Simon & Schuster.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Newell, P. (2021). Power shift: The global political economy of energy transitions. Cambridge University Press.

Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

Paterson, M. (1996). Global warming and global politics. Routledge.

Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. MIT Press.

Speth, J. G., & Haas, P. M. (2006). Global environmental governance. Island Press.

Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.

Sunderlin, W. D., Larson, A. M., & Cronkleton, P. (2009). Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Vogler, J. (2016). Climate change in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Fikri Ardiyansyah. (2025). KERJA SAMA INDONESIA–NORWEGIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI RESULT-BASED CONTRIBUTION UNTUK PENGURANGAN EMISI DARI DEFORESTASI DAN DEGRADASI HUTAN PERIODE 2020–2025. Journal Social Politics and Humanities, 1(3), 45-57. https://www.journalsph.com/index.php/home/article/view/29